The four design alternatives and "no build" have been evaluated for the criteria in the tables below.
The project area is primarily in the city of Sherwood with a portion of the project outside of the city limits. The portion of the project outside of the city of Sherwood is subject to Article VII land use review, shown in Table 2.
Alternative 1 |
Alternative 2 |
Alternative 3 |
Alternative 4 |
No Build |
|
Widen equally about the existing centerline |
Shift alignment to east |
Widen road to the south/west |
Widen road to the north/east |
No change |
|
Transportation System Operations |
|||||
Meets TSP objectives |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Geometric Impacts |
|||||
Requires design exception |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
N/A |
Right-of-Way Impacts |
|||||
Approximate right-of-way impacts (square feet) |
1,600 |
59,500 |
5,300 |
8,300 |
N/A |
Residential buildings impacted (number) |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
AF-20 (Exclusive Agricultural and Forest District) impacts |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Built and Planned Environment |
|||||
Impacts to existing and proposed land uses |
Least impactful to adjacent properties. Some right-of-way acquisition required, but no change to land uses. |
Most impactful to adjacent properties. Right-of-way acquisition and relocations required. Would result in changes to land uses. |
Most impactful to AF-20 property. |
Impacts to residential land use. |
No change |
Air quality |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Noise |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
No traffic noise mitigation provided |
Hazardous materials |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No change |
Historic and cultural resources |
Minimal impacts to cemetery frontage |
Minimal impacts to cemetery frontage |
Minimal impacts to cemetery frontage |
Minimal impacts to cemetery frontage |
No change |
Recreation resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Visual Resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Natural environment |
|||||
Wetlands |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Aquatic resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Terrestrial ecology |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Hydrology and hydraulics |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
No change |
Water quality |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
No change. Current runoff is treated to outdated standards. |
|
Alternative 1 |
Alternative 2 |
Alternative 3 |
Alternative 4 |
No Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Widen equally about the existing centerline |
Shift alignment to east |
Widen road to the south/west |
Widen road to the north/east |
No change |
|
Transportation System Operations |
|||||
Meets TSP objectives |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Geometric Impacts |
|||||
Requires design exception |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
N/A |
Right-of-Way Impacts |
|||||
Approximate right-of-way impacts (square feet) |
0 |
0 |
5,300 |
0 |
N/A |
Residential buildings impacted (number) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N/A |
AF-20 (Exclusive Agricultural and Forest District) impact |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Built and Planned Environment |
|||||
Existing and proposed land uses |
No change to land uses |
No change to land uses |
Reduced property size, but no change to land uses |
No change to land uses |
No change |
Air quality |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Acceptable |
Noise |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
Traffic noise mitigation proposed per Washington County's Noise Policy |
No traffic noise mitigation provided |
Hazardous materials |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No anticipated impacts |
No change |
Historic and cultural resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Recreation resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Visual resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Natural Environment |
|||||
Wetlands |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Aquatic resources |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Terrestrial ecology |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No impacts |
No change |
Hydrology and hydraulics |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
Surface water management provided |
No change |
Water quality |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
Stormwater management provided |
No change. Current runoff is treated to outdated standards. |